This may seem like mere symantics, but we're currently reconsidering the core role (and designation) of the Creative Director.
I don't think it's trivial at all... Because hasn't a CD's role evolved into more than just the directing of creative elements or execution? Isn't it more about identifying and delivering effective solutions to meet a client's business objective?
And if this means coming up with a non-advertising solution - for instance, developing an internal communication programme, a website or a PR drive - well, then so be it.
We're right now mulling: Director - Creative Services.
I honestly don't care for a designation to establish where I stand in a hierarchy. I want to define a role to live up to, and give others an allusion of what to expect from me.
I would really appreciate your opinion on this.
Pain.
-
For as long as there have been saps on earth, they’ve been told what I’ve
been told for my entire sad life. No matter what pain you’re in, no matter
how ...
2 days ago
1 comment:
One day, I hope to have an opinion on this that will matter.
Anyhow, I still don't think it'll matter that much. For a long time, people will end up calling you the Creative Director. I mean, who's going to say 'Hey here is the Director of the Creative Services'
Of course, its a different issue on paper altogether.
Yes, you're right, I should stop talking.
Brilliant, BRILLIANT anti-smoking ad. Loved it.
Post a Comment